Dekolonizace produkce vědění. Kritický obrat v romistických studiích
Klíčová slova:
Romistika, dekolonizace, produkce vědění, kritická romistická studiaAbstrakt
Text představuje soubor literatury v oblasti romistiky, která přebírá širší důrazy postkolonialismu a dekolonizace. Zaměřuje se tak především na okolnosti vzniku proudu kritických romistických studií a stejnojmeného časopisu Critical Romani Studies. V této souvislosti se dotýká širších otázek po tom kdo a jakými způsoby produkuje vědění o Romech.Reference
Adcock, R. 2006. Generalization in comparative and historical social science: the difference that interpretivism makes. In: Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P. (eds.). Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 50–66.
Ashton-Smith, A. 2010. Colonized culture: the emergence of a Romani postcolonialism. Journal of Post- Colonial Cultures and Societies 1 (2): 73–90.
Bogdal, K. M. 2014. Europa erfindet die Zigeuner. Eine Geschichte von Faszination und Verachtung (Europe invents the Zigeuner. A story of fascination and contempt). Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Bogdan, M., Dunajeva, J., Junghaus, T., Kóczé, A., Rostas, I., Rövid, M., Szilvasi, M. 2018. Introducing the new journal Critical Romani Studies. Critical Romani Studies 1 (1): 2–7.
Bogdan, M., Ryder, A., Taba, M. 2015. The Roma spring: knowledge production and the search for a new humanity. Roma Rights Journal 2: 33–38.
Brooks, E., Clark, C., Rostas, I. 2022. Engaging with decolonisation, tackling antigypsyism: lessons from teaching Romani Studies at the Central European University in Hungary. Social Policy and Society 21 (1): 68–79.
Burney, S. 2012. Conceptual frameworks in postcolonial theory: applications for educational critique. Counterpoints 417: 173–193.
Cancian, F. M. 1993. Conflicts between activist research and academic success: participatory research and alternative strategies. The American Sociologist 24 (1): 92–106.
Clark, C. 2020. Roma knowledge-production – examining the critical turn in Romani Studies. Barvalipe Roma Online University. ERIAC.
Dunajeva, J., Vajda, V. 2021. Positionality and fieldwork: participatory research with Roma. In: Burns, D., Howard, J., Ospina, S. (eds.). Sage handbook for participatory research. London: Sage, 224–237.
Hobbs, D., Wright, R. 2006. Preface. In: Hobbs, D., Wright, R. (eds.). The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. London: Sage, x–xi.
hooks, b. 1989. Talking back: thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.
Jefferess, D. 2008. Postcolonial resistance: culture, liberation, and transformation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kóczé, A. 2014. A rasszista tekintet és beszédmód által konstruált roma férfi és női testek a médiában (Construction of Romani male and female bodies by the racist gaze and discourse in the media). Apertúra, Hungarian Journal of Social Theories and Cultural Studies – online: 1–18. Dostupné z: https://www. apertura.hu/2014/nyar-osz/kocze-a-rasszista-tekintet-es-beszedmod-altal-konstrualt-roma-ferfi-es-noi-testek-a-mediaban/ [cit. 25. 1. 2023].
Kóczé, A., Rövid, M. 2012. Pro-Roma global civil society: acting for, with or instead of Roma? In: Kaldor, M., Moore, H. L. Global civil society 2012: ten years of Critical Reflection. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, K. 2000. Orientalism and gypsylorism. Social Analysis 44 (2): 129–156.
Mirga-Kruszelnicka, A. 2015. Romani Studies and emerging Romani scholarship. Roma Rights Journal 2: 39–46.
Mirga-Kruszelnicka, A. 2018. Challenging anti-gypsyism in academia: the role of Romani scholars. Critical Romani Studies 1 (1): 8–28.
Palriwala, R. 2005. Fieldwork in a post-colonial anthropology. Experience and the comparative. Social Anthropology 13 (2): 151–170.
Parsons, J. B., Harding, K. J. 2011. Post-colonial theory and action research. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 2 (2): 1–6.
Rostas, I., Rövid, M., Szilvási, M. 2015. On Roma civil society, Roma inclusion, and Roma participation. Roma Rights Journal 2: 7–10.
Ryder, A. 2015, (October 29). Reflection on Roma research and activism. Dostupné z: http://www.errc.org/news/reflections-on-roma-research-and-activism [cit. 25. 1. 2023].
Ryder, A., Taba, M., Trehan, N. 2022. The Roma movement at a crossroads – competing visions of Roma civil society and their implications for sustainable community organizing. ELTE POL-IR Working Paper Series. Budapest: Series of the ELTE Institute of Political and International Studies, 1–42.
Said, E. 1979). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Selling, J. 2018. Assessing the historical irresponsibility of the Gypsy Lore Society in light of Romani subaltern challenges. Critical Romani Studies 1 (1): 44–61.
Selling, J. 2022. Romani liberation: a northern perspective on emancipatory struggles and progress. Budapest: CEU Press.
Stewart, M. 2017. Nothing about us without us, or the dangers of a closed-society research paradigm. Romani Studies 27 (2): 125–146.
Trehan, N., Kóczé, A. 2009. Racism, (neo)colonialism and social justice: the struggle for the soul of the Romani movement in post-socialist Europe. In: Huggan, G., Law, I. (eds.). Racism. Postcolonialism. Europe. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 50–76.
Vajda, V. 2015. Towards 'critical whiteness' in Romani Studies. Roma Rights. Nothing About Us Without Us? Roma Participation in Policy Making and Knowledge Production 2: 47–56.
Vajda, V. 2019. Gebildete non-Roma: partnering with Roma in the struggle against structural antigypsyism. Dizertační práce. Brighton: University of Sussex, School of Global Studies.
Verena, M. 2018. 'Neither bloody persecution nor well intended civilizing missions changed their nature or their number': a postcolonial approach to protestant 'Zigeuner' missionary efforts. Critical Romani Studies Journal 1 (1): 86–112.
Young, R. 2016. Colonialism and the politics of postcolonial critique. In: Young, R. Postcolonialism: a historical introduction, anniversary edition. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 1–12.
Stažení
Publikováno
Číslo
Sekce
Licence
Copyright (c) 2025 Romano džaniben
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .
